SCHIP-pery Slope
Monday October 8, 2007
The Mullblog!
Check out the new Mullings Blog.
This edition of MULLINGS is there and you can post your comments!
Click here for an Easy Print Version
The House and Senate sent a hugely expanded version of the SCHIP program to the President and the President, as promised, vetoed the bill.
First things first. SCHIP is not pronounced "ship." It is pronounced "ESS-chip."
Now for the dead lock bar bet: SCHIP stands for � State Children's Health Insurance Program.
Which, of course, it is not. It is a FEDERAL children's health insurance program but "EFF-chip" wasn't ever going to fly if only because it sounds too much like F-Troop.
According to PBS, the original CHIP (no S) program was adopted in 1997 having been supported by President Bill Clinton.
The idea behind this program is a worthy one: To provide health insurance to children whose families are too poor to afford the premiums on their own, but make too much to qualify for coverage under Medicaid.
The program which has been in effect covers young Americans up to the age of 18 with a family income of not more than twice the official poverty level.
According to the Department of Health & Human Services web site, in 2007 a family of four was deemed living at the poverty level if it had an annual income of not more than $20,650. That level of income for a family of four would qualify as poverty in 2007 under any fair assessment.
A child in that family qualifies for health care through Medicaid but a family making a total income of $30,000 would not. Under the existing SCHIP guidelines a child with a family income of up to $40,000 would qualify.
But, the Democrats' re-do has upped the income level for a child to qualify to $83,000 - FOUR times the poverty level (at least in New York) which is an income stretching the definition of "poverty" to the point of snapping.
Not only that, but the Democrats' bill redefines a "child" as someone up to age 25, stretching the definition of "child" to � well, you know.
There may be people who believe that if you can't afford health insurance for your kids, that's just too bad, but I am not one of them. The kids didn't ask to be born - and they certainly did not ask to be born into a family earning just 200% of the poverty level.
Of course, the Popular Press has joined with its allies in the Democratic Party to portray President Bush as being anti-child. The Washington Post's Michael Abramowitz and Jonathan Weisman led their piece thus:
"President Bush yesterday vetoed a $35 billion expansion of a popular children's health insurance program, a move that left him as politically isolated as he has ever been and had even Republican allies questioning his hard-line strategy."
President Bush made it clear that he wanted the Congress to send him a re-authorized SCHIP program which he could sign, but Democrats sent up a bill which the White House had warned was veto-bait.
Why? So they could set up this exact discussion: Bush will argue in favor of tax cuts for the rich, while he vetoes health care for poor children.
No main stream medium will write this, but the reality of the situation is: Congressional Democrats were willing to trade the health of children to score political points against the President.
It is also true that if they can expand coverage to families up to 400% of the poverty line and individuals up to the age of 25, Democrats can go to 800% of poverty ($160,000 per year) and individuals up to 65 (when Medicare kicks in).
National. Health. Insurance.
I told a New York Times reporter when I was called about the political impact of the President's veto that for many - if not most - Republican primary voters, this expansion of the SCHIP program was not a step down the slippery slope of national health care - it was a four man bobsled on an Olympic run.
He didn't use the quote.
On the Secret Decoder Ring page today: A link to an explanation of F-Troop, the HHS poverty page, and the White House myth/fact page. Also an Autumnal Mullfoto and a Catchy Caption of the Day.
Also, if you haven't yet, you should check out the Mullblog!. There is interesting stuff there and, you can respond for the whole world to see.
--END --
Copyright © 2007 Barrington Worldwide, LLC
Become a Paid Mullings Subscriber!
(To join the FREE mailing list or to unsubscribe Click Here)
Current Issue |
Secret Decoder
Ring | Past
Issues | Email
Rich | Rich
Who?
Copyright �2006 Richard
A. Galen | Site design by Campaign
Solutions. |