Mullings An American Cyber Column By Rich Galen

US & Int'l Papers

�

Click here for the Secret Decoder Ring to this issue!

Conservateurs, Oui; Socialistes, Non

Monday May 7, 2007

Click here for an Easy Print Version

Don't forget to check out

New Every Friday!

Got a question? Get an answer. Send an e-mail to
Dear Mr. Mullings

Watching the Sunday news programs, you get the distinct impression that the geniuses who analyze the US Presidential election believe the real race is among the Democrats, from whom the next President will be chosen, while the Republicans are merely playing at running for President because none of them can possibly win.

Come with me to France where the Conservative candidate Nicolas Sarkozy got a bit over 53% of the vote while the Socialist, S�gol�ne Royal, got under 47% in the election for President on Sunday to replace Jacques Chirac.

Didn't hear much about this in the US? Wanna know why? Because the Socialist got trounced and the Conservative won.

Not only that, but according to the reporting of Katrin Bennhold and Elaine Sciolino writing in the International Herald Tribune, "The departure of Chirac is also expected to clear the air with Washington. Sarkozy is more pro-American - and pro-Israeli - than many other French politicians.

Whoa! Check, S'il vous plait.

Let me type that one more time: A pro-American and Pro-Israeli Conservative won the election for President in France.

Again, from the IHT: Sarkozy voters went to the polls with a message: it's time to reform the economy. He plans to relax the 35-hour workweek, create more flexible work contracts and reduce the highest personal tax rate from 60 percent to 50 percent.

The UK Telegraph reporters wrote: Mr. Sarkozy, who has angered France's political elite by extolling America's low-tax, hard-work economy, praised the US but signaled future clashes over the issue of climate change.

The BBC wrote, "Sarkozy has pledged to bring unemployment down from 8.3% to below 5% by 2012."

The US unemployment rate which was updated this past Friday rose to 4.5% (from 4.4%). If unemployment in the US had been 8.3% last November the Democrats would have picked up 75 more seats in the House and 10 more in the Senate.

In pointing out the problems of the Socialists in France, who have now lost for the third straigt time, the Financial Times wrote:

The Socialists now face the question of whether they can ever regain power without ditching their anti-capitalist rhetoric, as the mainstream left has done across almost all of Europe.

The Socialist candidate, Royal, according to the FT,

"never seemed able to escape from her party's rigid ideological barriers. Every time she tried, for instance by suggesting military camps for young offenders, it provoked a volley of criticism from the party apparat."

I bring that to your attention because of a piece in the NY Times which pointed out that MoveOn.org is attempting to run the Congressional Iraq strategy. According to the NYT the leadership of MoveOn wrote a "harshly worded warning" to Congressional Dems which contained the following:

"In the past few days, we have seen what appear to be trial balloons signaling a significant weakening of the Democratic position," the letter read. "On this, we want to be perfectly clear: if Democrats appear to capitulate to Bush - passing a bill without measures to end the war - the unity Democrats have enjoyed and Democratic leadership has so expertly built, will immediately disappear."

Look how well those kinds of threats worked in France. I wonder if MoveOn.Org has been in France helping run the campaign of Mme. Royal.

Here's a line from the IHT which Republican candidates should paste to the computer screen of every campaign staffer:

"Sarkozy is a longtime figure in party politics, a member of Chirac's government for the last five years, who succeeded in looking like a maverick, distancing himself from Chirac and ridding himself of the baggage of an unpopular incumbent."

Memo to Washington talking heads: By the time we get through the August recess, Republican candidates will have sailed off on a wide variety of new directions. Voters - even French voters - are smarter than you think they are.

There's a reason we actually hold the elections, rather than just depend on TV analysts to tell us who is going to win.

On a the Secret Decoder Ring page today: Links to many of the articles referenced above. A Mullfoto which says a great deal about government rules; and a Catchy Caption of the Day with which you will agree.

ALSO Dear Mr. Mullings. New Every Friday!

Become a
Paid Mullings Subscriber!

(To join the FREE mailing list or to unsubscribe Click Here)

Current Issue | Secret Decoder Ring | Past Issues | Email Rich | Rich Who?