Women. Can't Live With 'em ...
Friday February 24, 2006
Click here for an Easy Print Version
Larry Summers is stepping down as President of Harvard University.
Normally we wouldn't be the least concerned about anything going on at Harvard - with the possible exception of a cheating scandal involving a Spanish test and the senior Senator from Massachusetts - nor with a former member of Bill Clinton's cabinet.
But, the matter of Larry Summers is interesting because it occurs at the intersection of academic freedom and political correctness.
To review the bidding, a little over a year ago Dr. Summers (PhD in economics, Harvard '82) gave a speech in which he indicated (well, he actually said), "women do not have the same 'innate ability' or 'natural ability' as men in some fields."
This was not handled at all well by some of the gals in the all-female audience and caused quite the little stir at the time (see MULLINGS- 01-19-05) leading to the Harvard faculty voting "no confidence" in Dr. Summers. Just in case word of their displeasure hadn't gotten to his office, another no confidence vote was scheduled for next week if he didn't resign.
In the interests of academic curiosity, let us reverse the facts and pretend that a tenured professor had said "women do not have the same innate ability as men" and soon-to-be-former President Summers had demanded that professor resign.
The faculty might well have refused to sup with the troglodyte in the faculty dining hall, but we assume they would have defended his right to free academic speech with utmost vigor (that's the way we write when we are speaking of university faculty people and the like).
The campus newspaper, the Harvard Crimson, which is not likely to produce any Pulitzer Prize winners soon, took a survey and reported it thus:
"Male undergraduates in the survey tended to give Summers higher marks than their female counterparts did. Sixty-six percent of male respondents said that the embattled president should not vacate his post, while only 45 percent of the women said that they wanted Summers to stay."
Memo to the faculty advisor of the Harvard Crimson: When you finish voting, please tell that young writer that a difference of 21 percentage points between men and women indicates a somewhat more bifurcated view of life than "tended to give �"
How about:
"As a clear example of exactly the kind of gender differences to which Dr. Summers was referring, a recent survey of undergrads showed that, while far fewer than half the female students polled (45%) thought Summers should stay, fully two-thirds (66%) of the males sampled believed he should remain."
Meanwhile, Google, which is having a tough time these days what with bowing to Chinese pressure to block unfriendly websites and having the Feds wanting to look into users' search patterns, has now has lost a copyright suit.
It seems that Google has been posting thumbnail images of women in a state of undress (to use a Victorian construct designed to fool your organization's spam catcher). The site which owned these photos sued Google for infringing on its copyright.
Here's the summary of Federal Judge A. Howard Matz's decision:
Google � assumes that persons seeking [the] photos are searching for the models and for sexual gratification" [and] contends this "implies a factual nature of the photographs."
The Court rejects this argument. The photographs consistently reflect professional, skillful, and sometimes tasteful artistry. That they are of scantily-clad or nude women is of no consequence; such images have been popular subjects for artists since before the time of "Venus de Milo."
Some idle questions:
1. When drew this case, do you think Judge Matz exchanged high fives with the other judges in the "Their Honors-Only" locker room?
2. How many photos did the good judge have to examine to come to his conclusion that the "photographs consistently reflect �?"
3. Would Judge Matz like to be President of Harvard?
On a the Secret Decoder Ring page today: Links to the Boston Globe's coverage of the Harvard mess; the official definition of "troglodyte;" a link to the Google/Noods soot; a Mullfoto of a toilet in France; and another stupid Cheney-themed Catchy Caption of the Day.
--END --
Copyright © 2006 Richard A. Galen
Become a
Paid Mullings Subscriber!
(To join the FREE mailing list or to unsubscribe Click Here)
Current Issue |
Secret Decoder
Ring | Past
Issues | Email
Rich | Rich
Who?
Copyright �2006 Richard
A. Galen | Site design by Campaign
Solutions. |
US & Int'l Papers
� 
